The case reviewed in PLJ 1997 SC 985 included a declaration that respondents, remaining co-sharers, were being proprietors of the land. The fit was originally dismissed, but on charm, it was decreed in favor in the respondents. The Court managed that a co-sharer with symbolic possession can protect their rights https://leasehold-and-tenancy-law29257.eedblog.com/31217696/details-fiction-and-title-and-ownership-lawyer-in-karachi-near-me